Comments on: Visual Studio 2010 with Parallels http://www.typemismatch.com/2009/11/24/visual-studio-2010-with-parallels/ just a projection of my own imagination Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:02:59 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: typemismatch http://www.typemismatch.com/2009/11/24/visual-studio-2010-with-parallels/comment-page-1/#comment-5748 typemismatch Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:02:59 +0000 http://www.typemismatch.com/2009/11/24/visual-studio-2010-with-parallels/#comment-5748 Cool - since I wrote that post I couldn't be happier with PD5, I already own both Fusion 3 and PD5 and can still say the vmware have not fixed their problems. Cool – since I wrote that post I couldn’t be happier with PD5, I already own both Fusion 3 and PD5 and can still say the vmware have not fixed their problems.

]]> By: Justin http://www.typemismatch.com/2009/11/24/visual-studio-2010-with-parallels/comment-page-1/#comment-5746 Justin Mon, 01 Mar 2010 18:46:02 +0000 http://www.typemismatch.com/2009/11/24/visual-studio-2010-with-parallels/#comment-5746 I too had the same assumption and have been happily using Fusion 3 until I noticed the huge performance hit while using WPF applications (mainly VS2010). I cringed when thinking about Parallels (simply because of early experiences with it early on, versions prior to 4). But it has come a long way and seems much faster than Fusion. VS2010 loads much much faster and my build times seem to be a little quicker as well. I too had the same assumption and have been happily using Fusion 3 until I noticed the huge performance hit while using WPF applications (mainly VS2010).

I cringed when thinking about Parallels (simply because of early experiences with it early on, versions prior to 4). But it has come a long way and seems much faster than Fusion. VS2010 loads much much faster and my build times seem to be a little quicker as well.

]]>